{"id":4562,"date":"2018-08-31T14:12:44","date_gmt":"2018-08-31T13:12:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kennywilson.org\/?p=4562"},"modified":"2018-08-31T14:12:44","modified_gmt":"2018-08-31T13:12:44","slug":"how-coffee-bars-fueled-the-vietnam-peace-movement-the-new-york-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kennywilson.space\/index.php\/2018\/08\/31\/how-coffee-bars-fueled-the-vietnam-peace-movement-the-new-york-times\/","title":{"rendered":"How Coffee Bars Fueled the Vietnam Peace Movement – The New York Times"},"content":{"rendered":"

Further evidence of the importance of coffee bars in the radical culture of the 1960s. (From the New York Times.)<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

In the summer of 1967, Fred Gardner arrived in San Francisco with the Vietnam War weighing heavily on his mind. Gardner was 25 years old, a Harvard graduate and a freelance journalist for a number of major publications. He was attracted to Northern California\u2019s mix of counterculture and radical politics, and hoped to become more actively involved in the movement to end the war. He was particularly interested in the revolutionary potential of American servicemen and couldn\u2019t understand why antiwar activists and organisers weren\u2019t paying more attention to such a powerful group of potential allies.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Ever since completing a two-year stint in the Army Reserves in 1965, Gardner had been closely watching the increasing instances of military insubordination, resistance and outright refusal that were accompanying the war\u2019s escalation. From the case of the Fort Hood Three \u2014 G.I.s arrested in 1966 for publicly declaring their opposition to the war and refusal to deploy \u2014 to the case of Howard Levy, an Army dermatologist who refused his assignment to provide medical training for Special Forces troops headed to Vietnam, it was clear that the Army was fast becoming the central site of an unprecedented uprising. By 1967, the \u201cG.I. movement\u201d was capturing national headlines.<\/p>\n

And it wasn\u2019t just the war that was aggravating American servicemen. The military\u2019s pervasive racial discrimination \u2014 unequal opportunities for promotion, unfair housing practices, persistent harassment and abuse \u2014 fueled increasing outrage among black G.I.s as the war progressed. Influenced by the civil rights and black liberation movements, black soldiers participated in widespread and diverse acts of resistance throughout the Vietnam era. Racial tensions were particularly high in the Army, where a vast majority of draftees were being sent, and where evasion, desertion and insubordination rates among black G.I.s exploded in the war\u2019s later years. An antiwar movement in the military was beginning to take shape, with black soldiers often its vanguard.<\/p>\n

Photo<\/span><\/p>\n
\n
\"\"
Antiwar veterans protest at the Federal Building in Seattle, September 1968.\u00a0CreditFred Lonidier<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>
<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

As Gardner sat in the radical coffeehouses of San Francisco\u2019s North Beach neighborhood that summer, he thought about the explosive power of servicemen turning against the war and wondered how that power could be supported and nurtured by the civilian antiwar movement. Most of all, he wanted to find a way to reach out to disaffected young G.I.s, to show them that there was a whole community of antiwar activists and organizers who were on their side. He finally settled on an idea: opening a network of youth-culture-oriented coffeehouses, just like the ones in North Beach, in towns outside military bases around the country.<\/p>\n

In January 1968 he did just that, travelling with a fellow activist, Donna Mickleson, to Columbia, S.C., home of Fort Jackson, one of the Army\u2019s largest training bases and the crown jewel of the state\u2019s many military installations. The UFO coffeehouse, decorated with rock \u2019n\u2019 roll posters donated from the San Francisco promoter Bill Graham, quickly became a popular hangout for G.I.s \u2014 and a target of significant hostility from military officials, city authorities and outraged local citizens (\u201cIt\u2019s a sore spot in our craw,\u201d a Columbia official said.) The coffeehouse was located just off base, out of the military\u2019s reach but close enough for soldiers to visit during their free time \u2014 places where active-duty servicemen, veterans and civilian activists could meet to plan demonstrations, publish underground newspapers and work to build the nascent peace movement within the military.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

By the summer of 1968, major antiwar organizations took notice of the controversy the UFO was stirring up in Columbia and initiated a \u201cSummer of Support\u201d to organize funds for more coffeehouse projects around the country. In ensuing years, more than 25 \u201cG.I. coffeehouses\u201d opened up near military bases in the United States and at a number of bases overseas.<\/p>\n

Over the course of six years, the coffeehouse network would play a central role in some of the G.I. movement\u2019s most significant actions. At the Oleo Strut coffeehouse in Killeen, Tex., local staff and G.I.s mobilized to support the Fort Hood 43 \u2014 a large group of black soldiers who were arrested at a meeting to discuss their refusal to deploy for riot control duty at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago. A black veteran present at the meeting described its mood: \u201cA lot of black G.I.s knew what the thing was going to be about and they weren\u2019t going to go and fight their own people.\u201d Army authorities were caught off guard by the publicity the coffeehouse brought to the case, and began to examine their strategies for dealing with political expression among the ranks.<\/p>\n

When eight black G.I.s, each of them leaders of the group G.I.s United Against the War in Vietnam, were arrested in 1969 for holding an illegal demonstration at Fort Jackson, the UFO coffeehouse served as a local operations center, drumming up funds for lawyers and promoting the \u201cFort Jackson Eight\u201d story to the national media. After G.I. and civilian activists created intense public pressure, officials quietly dropped all charges, signaling a shift in how the military would respond to soldiers expressing dissent.<\/p>\n

During its brief lifetime, the G.I. coffeehouse network was subjected to attacks from all sides \u2014 investigated by the F.B.I. and congressional committees, infiltrated by law enforcement, harassed by military authorities and, in a number of startling cases, terrorized by local vigilantes. In 1970, at the Fort Dix coffeehouse project in Wrightstown, N.J., G.I.s and civilians were celebrating Valentine\u2019s Day when a live grenade flew in through an open door; it exploded, seriously injuring two Fort Dix soldiers and a civilian. Another popular coffeehouse, the Covered Wagon in Mountain Home, Idaho (near a major Air Force base), was a frequent target of harassment by outraged locals, who finally burned it to the ground.<\/p>\n

Though their numbers dwindled as the war drew to a close in the mid-1970s, G.I. coffeehouses left an indelible mark on the Vietnam era. While popular mythology often places the antiwar movement at odds with American troops, the history of G.I. coffeehouses, and the G.I. movement of which they were a part, paints a very different picture. Over the course of the war, thousands of military service members from every branch \u2014 active-duty G.I.s, veterans, nurses and even officers \u2014 expressed their opposition to American policy in Vietnam. They joined forces with civilian antiwar organizations that, particularly after 1968, focused significant energy and resources on developing social and political bonds with American service members. Hoping to build the resistance that was already taking shape in the Army, activists at G.I. coffeehouses worked directly with service members on hundreds of political projects and demonstrations, despite relentless government surveillance, infiltration and harassment.<\/p>\n

The unprecedented eruption of resistance and activism by American troops is critical to understanding the history of the Vietnam War. The G.I. movement and related phenomenon created a significant crisis for the American military, which feared exactly the kind of alliance between civilians and soldiers that Fred Gardner had in mind when he opened the first G.I. coffeehouse in 1968. Despite the extraordinary political and cultural impact that dissenting soldiers made throughout the Vietnam era, their voices have been nearly erased from history, replaced by a stereotypical image of loyal, patriotic soldiers antagonized and spat upon by ungrateful antiwar activists. In the decades since the war\u2019s end, countless Hollywood movies, books, political speeches and celebrated documentaries have repeated this image, obscuring the war\u2019s deep unpopularity among the ranks and the countless ways that American troops expressed their opposition.<\/p>\n

This historical erasure serves a distinct purpose, casting dissent \u2014 from wearing an antiwar T-shirt to kneeling during the national anthem \u2014 as inherently disrespectful, even abusive, to American soldiers. A fuller reckoning with the era\u2019s history would begin by acknowledging the countless G.I.s and civilians who stood together against the war. G.I. coffeehouses are a vital window onto this history, showing us places where men and women came together to share their common revulsion at the war in Vietnam, and to begin organizing a collective effort to make it stop.<\/p>\n